Before the British arrived in India,
the country had been following laws that were based on the Arthsastra (300 BC)
and the Manusmriti (100 AD). This tradition continued despite the Muslim
conquest of India. After the advent of the Muslims the Sharia or Islamic law
was applied to them. This was superseded by a common law when India became a
part of the British Empire.
The Supreme Court of India commenced
operations in 1950. It presently has 30 judges apart from the Chief Justice of
India. The procedure of the Supreme Court is conducted in English only.
There is a huge backlog of cases of
which a large percentage is minor crimes belonging to the Motor Vehicle Act and
petty crimes. It is criminal that the time of the courts be wasted on such
petty issues. Prolonging the cases unduly by the litigants is a great problem
in India and in this the advocates work hand in glove with the litigants.
If one takes a look at the number of
cases pending in the Indian courts one would be shocked.
PENDING CASES:
Supreme Court ---- -39,780 Cases
(Civil and Criminal)
High Courts--------- 39 Lakh Cases (7
Lakh Criminal, 32 Lakh civil)
Subordinate Courts- 2.63 Crore Cases
Undertrails---------- 2.5 lakh
under-trails languishing in Jails
Judicial Strength----India has 14,576
judges as against the sanctioned strength of 17,641 including 630 High Court
Judges and 31 SC judges.
India has --------------------10.5
judges/million persons.
Bangladesh has----------- 12
judges/million
USA has-------------------- 107
judges/ million.
This would mean a judge has to hear
an average of 2100 cases per year. Considering that the court is open only
around 225 days a year this would mean each judge hearing at least 10 cases a
day which would result in only a single hearing of the case during the entire
year. And all of us know that cases go in for dozens of hearings.
Despite all this backlog the courts
enjoy the privileges of the British times. Does any office in the world close
for Summer holidays and Dussehra holidays and so on?. Our courts do. If anyone
questions them the courts would slap the contempt of court charges against
them.
There is rampant corruption
prevailing in Indian courts. As per Transparency International , delays in
disposal , shortage of judges and complex procedures have made the Indian
courts corruption prone.
The Supreme Court is showing its
disinclination to allow the judiciary to come into the Lokpal bill.
The judges have become a law unto
themselves. They have misused the powers given to them for protecting the law
to protect the judges from the law.
The Supreme Court of India has ruled
that no first information report (FIR) can be registered against a judge, nor,
a criminal investigation initiated without prior approval of the Chief Justice
of the Supreme Court.
Once appointed, a judge of the High
Court or Supreme Court cannot be sacked except by 2/3 majority of the members
present in the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha.
In the 1990s, when the Congress was
in power, there were charges of corruption against Justice V.Ramaswami of the
Supreme Court. A a panel of 3 judges (2 from the Supreme Court and 1 from the
High Court) found him guilty in 11 out of the 14 charges.
Despite this a motion seeking to
impeach Justice V Ramaswami could not be passed by parliament as the Congress
MP’s abstained from voting. Since it required a two third majority of the
members present the motion could not be passed. There have been no other
attempts at impeachment in India.
After retiring from service in 1994
Ramaswami sought election on an AIDMK ticket in 1999 but was thankfully
defeated.
In order to have effective justice a
restriction is to be placed on the number of hearings a case can be adjourned
and a time frame has to be fixed. Petty cases should be given even less time to
be finalized. The number of judges have to be raised to at least double that of
today. It is ironic that a country like Bangladesh is having a better
judge/population ratio than us.
Corruption in the judiciary will
totally undermine the justice system and the Supreme Court has to wake up to
this fact. The judiciary has to be brought under the Lokpal bill (this is
easier said than done due to the opposition of the Supreme Court).