Thursday, 22 August 2013

ANDHRA TELENGANA PROBLEM—GENESIS

The genesis of the Telengana problem has its roots in the Gentleman’s Agreement signed by the representatives of both Andhra and Telengana regions a list of who are given below.

Andhra region                                                            Telangana Region
B. Gopal Reddy                                                           B. Rama Krishna Rao
Chief Minister, Andhra State                                    Chief Minister, Hyderabad state 
N. Sanjeeva Reddy                                                     K.V. Ranga Reddy
G.Lachanna                                                                 M. Chenna Reddy 
Alluri Satyanarayana Raju                                          J.V. Narsing Rao


I am now giving the important points from the Gentleman’s Agreement. There are some other points which did not contribute to the present position, hence they are ignored.

A Regional Standing Committee:
1. There will be one legislature for the whole of Andhra Pradesh. 

2. Telangana region would have a Regional Standing Committee of MLA’s belonging to that region including the Ministers from that region but not including the Chief Minister.


3. The advice tendered by the Regional Committee will normally be accepted by the Government


4. The Regional Committee will deal with following matters:
1) Development and economic planning within the framework of the general development plans formulated by the State Legislature.
2) Local Self Government
3) Public health and sanitation, local hospitals and dispensaries.
4) Primary and secondary education.
5)Regulation of admission to the educational institutions in the telangana region.
6)Prohibition.
7) Sale of agricultural lands.
8) Cottage and small scale Industries.
9) Agriculture, Cooperative Societies, Markets and Fairs.

Unless revised by agreement earlier this arrangement will be reviewed after ten years.

B. Domicile Rules : Telangana is regarded as a unit as far as recruitment to subordinate services is concerned; posts borne on the cadre of these services may be reserved for being filled up by persons who satisfy the domicile conditions as prescribed under the existing Hyderabad Mulki Rules. ( 15 years of Stay in Telangana area)

C. Distribution of expenditure between Telangana and Andhra Regions. The expenditure of the new state on central and general administration should be borne proportionately by the two regions and the balance of income should be reserved for expenditure on the development of Telangana area.

D. Education: The existing educational facilities including Technical Education in Telangana should be secured to the students of Telangana and further improved.

E. Cabinet Quotas: The cabinet will consist of members in proportion of 60:40 percent for Andhra and Telangana respectively. If the Chief Minister is from one region the other region should be given Dy Chief Ministership.


PROBLEMS WITH THE AGREEMENT:
The people from Andhra who have signed the agreement seem to have done so in haste without deliberating about the consequences. . Neither could they visualize that such provisions can lead to dissatisfaction of the Telengana people as those would be impossible to implement.

Because of this agreement it would be a right of the MLA’s of Telengana who are on the SRC to go at variance with the majority opinion of the assembly on many major issues.

The Mulki domicile rules debar a person from the Andhra region to get employed in the subordinate services unless he was domiciled in the Telengana region for 15 years or more. The Mulki rules were challenged in the Supreme Court and was upheld by them in 1972. This sparked off the Jai Andhra movement for a separate Andhra state.

Reserving the seats in the educational institutions in Telengana to the students from Telengana is also difficult to implement once the region develops.

Although Dy CM from Telengana should have been appointed as per the agreement, it was never implemented.

So, I feel that the present crisis is because of those gentlemen who signed the agreement. They are so emotionally attached to the concept of a unified state for the Telugu people that their reason has failed them.

It is interesting to note that the SRC appointed by the then Government was against the immediate merger of Telengana with Andhra region as it felt that the large differential in the literacy of Andhra and Telengana was feared by the people of Telengana and hence the regions should not be merged. It can be done so later when approved by a two thirds majority of the Telengana legislators.

Another point here is that Gauthu Lachanna who was one of the signatories to the Gentlemen’s Agreement from the Andhra side took a leading role in the Jai Andhra agitation demanding a separate Andhra State and was jailed during the course of the movement. Perhaps by then he realized the folly he has committed by signing the agreement in haste. The jai Andhra agitation was ruthlessly suppressed and in the process 8 people died in the police firing.

Tuesday, 23 April 2013

FRANCIS BACON THE MEAN YET BRILLIANT PHILOSOPHER

Bacon has an amazing personality. After hating him for his misdeeds one finally has to acknowledge the contribution he made to modern philosophy. One can hate his personality but not his intellect.

There were many varieties of philosophers before Sir Francis Bacon, but Sir Francis Bacon is the first scientific philosopher. He is the philosopher that reflected the thinking of the modern world.

The modern era started in Europe before Bacon; Gutenburgh, Colombus, Vasco da Gama, Magellan, Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, Leonardo da Vinci, Vesalius, William Harvey and Shakespeare appeared and made the world a better place to live in. Bacon represents this modern era and gave it a philosophical justification.

In the olden times before the tremendous developments that took place in science most things are accepted without verification but the modern scientific outlook changed that and asserted that nothing be accepted without proof and verification. Bacon is a philosopher that represented this outlook.

It is the age of Queen Elizabeth which is considered to be the golden age in England. Bacon was born into an aristocratic family in the year 1561. His father Nicholas Bacon was the keeper of the great seal of the Queen and a politician. His mother Lady Ann Cook was very proficient in Greek and Latin and was also a philosopher.

The inheritance of genes from both sides has made Bacon both a politician and a philosopher as well. Unfortunately, they have not been complimentary and appeared separately on their own.

Till the age of 12 years, his mother herself taught him studies. He then joined the Trinity College at Cambridge. He was just 16 years old then but with a razor sharp intellect. Till that time Aristotle was considered an authority on many sciences in Europe. Bacon questioned that and entered into spats with professors on the validity of the Aristotilean systems. He said that Aristotle never checked any of his hypotheses with experiment and rejected all of them.
This is one side of Bacon. On the other side his father died when Bacon was just 18 and left him with an annual income of just 300 pounds and a small house. This is sheer poverty for Bacon. He is a spendthrift and lived a luxurious life. He has made making money by whatever means as the goal of his life. Perhaps if one may say, this may be one of the inheritances of the modern age.

Bacons near relative Sir William Cecil was the Prime Minister of Queen Elizabeth. Bacon lobbied with his uncle for a job in the court but his uncle did not oblige him. He then studied law in Greys Inn and became a famous lawyer, contested for the Parliament and won.

All his thoughts are concentrated on making money and political fame. For 12 years he did his best to get into the Queens court with no result. He then sought the help of the Earl of Essex who is great enemy of his uncle William Cecil. Bacon always spent ahead of his income and almost went to prison a number of times and the Earl of Essex saved him. The Earl even bequeathed an estate to him. Despite the Earls efforts he could not get Bacon into Elizabeth’s court. He wrote many books praising the Queen and gave many speeches with no result again.

After sometime a feud arose between the Earl and the Queen. The opponents of Essex charged him with treason and jailed him. Bacon like the cheat he was turned against Essex, testified against him and charged him with a plot to kill the queen and argued against him. Essex was sentenced to death and his head was cut off. Entire England despised Bacon for his mean mindedness, cheating nature and for stabbing his friend in the back.

That is why the famous English poet Alexander Pope remarked that there is no greater scientist, no greater intellectual and no greater shameless cheat than Bacon in the entire world.

Queen Elizabeth died in 1603 AD and James I from Scotland became the king. Bacon is now ready, he praised and praised James in his numerous letters and supported everything the King did in the Parliament. Finally the King yielded and appointed him as Solicitor General, then the Attorney General and finally Lord Chancellor who is the second highest ranked officer in the British Government. He became very rich and politically very powerful.

As usual it is his mean and cheating nature that brought his downfall. In less than 3 years there were hordes of corruption charges against him. He was tried, dismissed from his office and was imprisoned in the tower of London. After some time King James freed him after eliciting a confirmation from Bacon that he would not again come anywhere near the parliament or courts or into any administrative job.

Earlier he was writing his famous books when he was in politics. After being thrown out he lived in exile for 5 years when he devoted himself fully to philosophy. 

It is said that Rishi Agastya drank up all the oceans. Similarly Bacon imbibed all the world's sciences and proclaimed that I have taken all knowledge to be my province. Bacons Essays are a telling commentary of his knowledge and literate skills.


One wonders as to how Bacon after taking in so much knowledge and with all that brilliance became a miserable human being. Knowledge should lead one to light and not into darkness. But in Bacons case it did just the opposite. Yet, the modern world can never forget Bacon and his contribution to the advancement of humanity.

I will try to write about Bacons philosophy in another note sometime.

Saturday, 20 April 2013

VEDIC PHILOSOPHY.

A number of us Hindus who go about our rituals do not really know anything much about our actual religion and philosophy. We simply follow the religion without actually knowing its basis.

I feel we should at least know the basic elements on which our religion is built. I am making a very brief write up on it with a hope that at least those who bother to read it would know a little more about it. The Vedas are pure nature worship in the Samhitas which later passes onto something much more deeper in the Upanishads. There is much more that can be written on this topic but I am restricting it only to the very basics lest it should tax the minds of those who bother to read it.

A layman of philosophy considers the Vedas to be one but that is not the case. In fact each Veda consists of 4 parts.

They are:
1. Samhita, 2. Brahmana, 3. Aranyaka , 4. Upanishads.

There are 4 Samhitas and they are the 1.Rik, 2. Sama, 3.Yajur and 4. Atharva. 

A vedic sacrifice needs 4 priests:

1. Hota- Who addresses hymns in praise of the gods to invoke their presence and participation in the sacrifice.
2. Udgata- Who sings the hymns to entertain and please the gods.
3. Adhvaryu- Who performs the sacrifice according to the strict ritualistic code and gives the offerings to the gods.
4. Brahma- The general supervisor well versed in all the Vedas.

Rik is for the Hota, Sama is for the Udgata, Yajur is for the Adhvaryu and Atharva is for the Brahma.

The Samhitas are in poetry and consist of hymns to various Gods.

The Brahmanas are written in prose. They are the elaboration of the complicated ritualism of the Vedas. They deal with the rules and regulations laid down for the performance of the rites and the sacrifices. There is little philosophy in these and the Samhitas.

The appendages to the Brahmanas are the Aranyakas. They mark the transition from ritualistic to philosophic thought. There is a mystic interpretation of the Vedic sacrifices in them.

The concluding portion of the Aranyakas are the Upanishads. These are intensely philosophical and spiritual.

There are said to be 108 Upanishads in all. However, only 10 on which Sankaracharya has commented are taken as important. They are

1. Isha, 2. Kena, 3. Katha, 4. Prashna, 5. Mundaka, 6. Mandukya, 7. Aitareya, 8. Taittiriya, 9. Chandogya, 10 Brihadaranyaka.

The Upanishads regard karma kanda as secondary, being only a help to purify the mind by which one is made fit to receive the real teaching about Brahman.

Monday, 1 April 2013

TWO SCHOOLS OF PHILOSOPHY--CYNICISM AND EPICUREANISM.

I am giving below two diametrically opposing schools of Philosophy; Cynicism and Epicureanism. My preference is towards Epicureanism. Today we may feel that there is little of value in them, but the questioning spirit and the challenge to the known conventions mark both of them. It is only with challenge and questioning of our thoughts clarify concepts. If man is where he is today, it is only because of this spirit. Both these philosophies are some 2500 years old.

CYNICS.
Antisthenes is supposed to have originated this philosophy. In Latin cynicus means pertaining to dog. From thence the term cynic seems to have arisen. Diogenes, the cynic said that people should live like dogs.


Antisthenes is elder to Plato by 20 years and is a disciple of Socrates. By his time Pericles has died and Greece has become a part of Macedonia.

Antisthenes gave up all his worldly possessions. He lived with the common people and dressed and spoke like them. Like the Anarchists he said that there should not be any form of Government. He said that there should not be any property, the institution of marriage and also religion. He developed brashness in speech and cultivated an aggressive behavior. He believed that all men are selfish and there is nothing called goodness in mankind.

Diogenes, a disciple of Antisthenes surpassed his Guru. He used to live in a tub and used to search around Athens with a flame in hand to find the real man. It is said that one day Diogenes was sitting in the sun. Alexander the Great came to know of his fame and came to see him and asked Diogenes what he wanted. Diogenes asked the Emperor to move from the place where he is standing because Alexander’s shadow fell on him. Then Alexander said, “Had I not been Alexander I would have preferred to live like Diogenes.”

As per Diogenes life is bitter, education is a waste, life is a waste, there is treachery everywhere. Kings, subjects, science, happiness, money, fame, honor, patriotism, good, respect, home, food, culture, law and in fact the entire life is a waste as per him. Men should live like animals in intimacy with nature.

But, the Cynics said how does one gets freedom? In renouncing desires they said. All desires should be renounced they said. Desire creates fear. Riches are not permanent. Our ethics, our renunciation, our freewill, our mind are the only ones which are really ours. If this is cultivated then all world is ours.

Diogenes practiced what he preached. He used to go around begging with a bowl. In the 3rd century BC, Cynicism has become a fashion.

EPICUREANS
Another student of Socrates, Aristippus founded a system of philosophy now known as “Epicureanism”. He was born at Cyrine in Africa and his followers are also known as Cyrenaics.


Aristippus is dead against the Cynics. He said that all living beings try from birth to be happy and therefore, happiness is the ultimate goal of life.

He concurred with the Sophists and said that each person is his own measure. What is seen be one might not be seen by another. Your perception is yours and my perception is mine. I might view the external world differently than you. So one can never generalize about the external world. The same thing can be said about happiness too. You might achieve happiness by one method and I, by another. So, we cannot commit anything to a clear definition. There is nothing called higher or lower in happiness and everything is equal. Sensory happiness is as great as mental happiness because even mental happiness occurs only through the sensory organs. Sensory happiness is the best happiness, and the more intense it is, the happier you are.

The greatest philosopher of this school is Epicurus who was born at Samos in Greece. He established a school in Athens and enlightened many of his students on his philosophy and led a simple life. Although Epicurus believed happiness to be the end of human existence, he did not believe in unfettered happiness.

None of Epicurus’s works survive today and his ideas have come to us through the works of the Roman poet Lucretius.

Epicurus’s school had students from slaves as well as prostitutes. The Athenians claimed that his school is a place of debauchery. But it is possible that his students led a disciplined life. As a man Epicurus is very helpful and friendly. He believed that friendship is the sweetest thing in all of creation. He believed that the aim of life is happiness and life has to be lived happily. But his definition of happiness is different. He said that absence of sorrow is happiness, absence of desire is happiness. A calm mind and self-control is happiness. There is no happiness in searching for happiness; in fact happiness is not searching for happiness. Intense happiness is followed by intense sorrow. Therefore both have to be avoided. One has to enjoy happiness without knowing that one is enjoying it. One has to develop self-control for this. He had digestive problems so he believed that good digestion gives happiness and is very strict about eating habits in his school. He resented politics, property, fame etc. and said that one should live away from society in peace.

The external world does not allow man to live peacefully. One has to shed superstitions and meaningless fear too. One should not fear death and also unknown forces. The soul perishes with the body and nothing is left. It is a state where there are no feelings. So why should one fear death? There are Gods but they live far away and do not interfere in our affairs. They can neither help us nor harm us.

The entire universe is made up of atoms. Who created them? They are ever existing and are self-caused. They have motion in them. He also assumed a crude type of Darwinism.

Like the body, mind too is made up of atoms. With the body mind also perishes and nothing is left.
L

Sunday, 30 December 2012

RAPE...A UNIVERSAL PHENOMENA???

When the rape of Delhi shot into the national news, rightfully everyone was enraged. I was also one such and was seething in anger. In the process like all others I too started hating the antiquated justice system of India as well as our social milieu that seem to facilitate the rapist.

Immediately after the rape, one of my FB friends Vyom Sharma posted some statistics on rape after reading which I was perplexed and left it at that. But it did remain in my mind subdued.

Today, the poor girl has died and the entire nation is in mourning. At this point, somehow I felt that I should study the phenomena of rape a little more. I was under the false impression that rape is rampant in India on account of a weak justice system which left offenders unpunished. I also thought that male chauvinism that is prevalent in India has a role to play in that.

So I took up Wikipedia for information on rape and the results were shocking indeed. Please observe the figures below. Absolute numbers do not give a clear picture and the number of rapes per 1 lac population is better:

The first figure in the table below shows the number of cases reported in 2009 and the second shows the figures for 1 lac of population in 2010.

JAPAN                           1289                     1.1
CANADA                          576                     1.4
INDIA                           22172                     1.8
SPAIN                            1578                      3.4
RUSSIA                          1007                     3.8
DENMARK                      352                      6.4
THAILAND                     4636                      6.7
GERMANY                    7724                      8.9
FRANCE                      10108                    16.0
UK                               15934                     27.0
USA                             84767                     29.0
BOTSWANA                  1865                     88.5

Reference-Rape Statistics-- Wikipedia.

The irony is that Denmark which has the highest standard of living in the world and where free sex is practiced has a rape incidence of 6.4 per lac which is more than 3 times that of India.

Similarly in Thailand where sex is used for tourism, the incidence is 6.7 per lac.

Just look at figures for the US, it has an incidence of 29 per lac which is some 14 times that of India. In absolute figures too, the US had over 84,000 rapes in 2009 compared to over 22,000 for India. People would be surprised to know that 10% of the rape victims in the US are male.

Look at the high incidence in UK or France. Development seems to be no indicator to the incidence and neither is equality of women a factor.

Botswana has the highest incidence of rape in the world.

The figures prove that rape is universal and does not confine itself to any one country. Psychologists have to search the reasons for this phenomenon. I am shocked at these figures and I am sure all who see my post would find them equally shocking.

Wednesday, 14 November 2012

SOCRATES THE GREAT PHILOSOPHER.

Socrates was born in Periclean Athens in 470 BC. His father was a sculptor and his mother was a delivery nurse. He trained to be a sculptor but the trade did not appeal to him. He then learnt Geometry, Astronomy and Philosophy.

One day, Socrates along with his friend visited the Oracle at Delphi. The Oracle asked them as to who they are. Socrates replied, “There is only one thing I know and that is I know nothing”. His friend asked the Oracle as to who is the wisest man in the world. The Oracle said” Know thyself. There is none wiser than Socrates among men”. This made Socrates perplexed. From then onward he made it a mission to find someone else wiser than him so that the Oracle’s words are not correct.

He used to start off early morning and whomever he found on the way he held discussions. He used the method of dialectic developed by Zeno. In this a question is asked, an answer obtained-this answer is rejected by using logic and another question asked. No one could ever defeat him in a discussion.

His first question is “Tau Ti” which means, “What is it?” He always said define your terms first before starting any discussion. He said that defining a thing is knowledge and knowledge is nothing but virtue.

He called himself a Gadfly. He claimed that God made him like that so that he could bite humans and make them think and find knowledge. He also claimed himself to be a delivery nurse, one who delivers right ideas from humans.

Socrates was very ugly. He was short and fat. He had a bald head, big paunch, broad nose, a big mouth, eyes jutting out and a round face. Despite all this, once he opened his mouth people forgot his appearance. Such a wise man is he.

He never bothered about tomorrow and lived only for today. This put his wife and his three children in great difficulties, as he never bothered about them. The moment she saw him his wife used to admonish him and so he avoided going home altogether. He had food when a student invited him for food or else he went hungry.

He is not a drunkard but had liquor when some of his students offered it to him. In drinking too none could beat him. He had one old coat which he wore all the time and he had no sandals on his feet.

He suddenly used to lapse into meditation disregarding where he was. One day early in the morning he stood still at a place in one morning and went into one of his trances. People gathered around him in curiosity. He stood like that till next day morning and after coming out of the state walked off without talking to anyone watching him. There were other instances like this.

There was a tragedian named Agathon in Athens. One day he invited Socrates to a banquet. There a discussion on Love developed. Socrates in his usual fashion rejected all the theories that were presented to him defining love. He finally said Love is the souls yearning for experiencing the great beauty. A lover not only wants to see the beauty but also wants to create it. He also wants it to be permanent in the physical self. That is why man and woman love each other. That is why parents love their children. They not only bear children for perpetration of themselves but they are also their partners in search for their continuous search for beauty, their inheritors and researchers for that purpose.

What is this beauty that we are trying to give permanence through love? It is wisdom, morality, self-respect, bravery, justice, and faith. In one word beauty is truth. It is that which directly takes us into communion with God.

Socrates never wrote down his philosophical theories and that was done by Plato. Plato was a great writer and his prose is mercurial. He used the dialogues to put forth the views. There are four main dialogues of Plato. 1) Symposium- This contains the meaning of love and we described it in the earlier paras.2) Apology-In this Socrates answers the charges leveled against him.3) Crito-In this Crito the student of Socrates advises him to flee the country and the answer given by Socrates.4) Phaedo- In this the death of Socrates is described.

In all the dialogues of Plato, Socrates is the mouthpiece. It is believed by philosophers that Plato has in fact given out his own philosophy in the dialogues from the mouth of Socrates. Socrates is concerned more with ethical questions than metaphysics

Socrates criticized the Olympian Gods and was believed to be an atheist. This was actually not so but he believed that there is only one god and the soul is indestructible.

Socrates was very much against Democracy. He felt that since democracy is dependent on group strength, well thought out decisions could not be taken. After the Peloponnesian wars between Athens and Sparta Athens was defeated and Democracy was replaced by the 30 tyrants. The people rebelled on them again and Democracy was restored. The democratic Government turned against Socrates for his so called Atheism and his repulsion for democracy. They brought the charge of rejecting their gods as well as worshiping other gods on him. They also said that Socrates corrupted the youth and the fit punishment for him was death.

This charge was brought about by Anitus who was the head of the democratic Government that came to power in Athens. His son was a disciple of Socrates and defied his own father. A court of 500 judges tried Socrates and the prosecutor was Miletus. His death sentence was passed with 280 for and 220 against. The sentence was to be carried out with drinking of hemlock, a poisonous drink. As per the laws of Athens at that time for a man who was sentenced to death, there was a provision of seeking another punishment instead. He could have asked for imprisonment, he could have paid the penalty and got released or else he could have left Athens for another country. But he willfully chose death.

The defense put forward by Socrates against the death sentence was told in a beautiful narrative in a dialogue called “Apology” by Plato. In this Socrates said that he is not willing to take an alternate punishment. He said, “ I do not know death is good or bad but paying a fine or seeking imprisonment or seeking banishment form the country are indisputably bad. Why should I opt for them?”

Plato wrote about his death in a dialogue called “Phaedo” which is considered to be a gem in world literature. Socrates was finally executed by drinking of Hemlock.

Monday, 5 November 2012

DOES LIFE EXIST ON OTHER PLANETS IN THE UNIVERSE.

Life has arisen on the earth due to certain climatic conditions that are conducive to its formation and multiplication. Life on earth started as unicellular organisms which became more complex with the passage of millions of ears till the mammals originated in the Tertiary period of the Cenozoic era 75 million years ago followed by man in the Quaternary period of the same era a mere 1 million years ago.
Our galaxy, the Milky Way consists of 10,000 crore stars (10 raised to the power of 11) and the known universe consists of 10,000 crore galaxies. This means the total number of stars in the known universe is 10 raised to the power of 22 which is a mind boggling figure.
Astronomers have determined that 15% of the stars in the universe have solar systems. This translates to a figure of over 10 raised to the power of 21 for stars having solar systems.
Now for life to evolve the planets have to possess certain conditions. They are
1. Moderate temperature---If the planet is too close or too far away from the star, then the conditions of life prevailing on them is nil.
2. Presence of water---The presence of water on the planet is a must for the existence of life as we know.
3. Presence of Oxygen---Presence of Oxygen too is essential for life.
4. Presence of atmosphere---The planet has to be covered by atmosphere so that harmful cosmic rays do not get through and destroy life.
5. Moderate mass---If the planet is too heavy then life may evolve but that would prevent the evolution of higher and complex forms of life.
Let us now assume that point number 1 would be met only by 1 out of each 1000 planets. This would reduce the possible number of planets that support life to 10 raised to the power of 18.
Similarly if we consider each of the other conditions would have a chance of 1 in a 1000, the figure of the planets that can support life gets reduced by another 12 zeroes. 
Even after this severe reduction, still we would be left with a figure of 10 raised to the power of 6 or a million planets that can support life.

If there are a million planets in the Universe that can support life, then some of them would have life forms that would have evolved less than us and some of them would be more evolved than us. If we consider that the evolution of life on earth is in the top 10% of the planets, then there should be at least some 100,000 planets where life has progressed more than us.
Of these 100,000 planets if we consider that only 1 in a 1000 has achieved a civilization that can crack the light barrier, then the figure of such planets get reduced to just 100. 
100 is not a big figure from the Universe, but how is it that not a single civilization has tried to contact us? Even with our limited development we are desperately seeking to contact other civilizations in the universe, so they would have also done the same if they exist.

These assumptions points to the following 3 possibilities:
1. There is no other planet in the Universe that is as advanced as our own.
2. The barrier of light cannot be breached.
3. We are the only civilization in the Universe.

Now, the above deductions have been done taking into account life as we know. There is no reason to believe that there may not be life forms that are totally different from the principles that are known to us.
I am no professional astronomer but just a person interested in Astronomy and the mysteries of the Universe. I faintly remember reading a book in my native language Telugu over 30 years ago which has similarly deduced about intelligent life forms in the universe. I do not exactly recollect what the book has said in its conclusion, but it has proceeded on similar lines.
I have arrived at the above from the knowledge I have and it may look fallacious to a professional who is researching in the field of life in the universe yet I feel very interested on the matter and am posting this.

Wednesday, 3 October 2012

MAHATMA GANDHI--AN ABRIDGED CRITICAL BIOGRAPHY

Today is the birthday of a great man. I have read his "My Experiments with Truth" a long time ago . When I remembered him I found that if someone asks me to narrate his life I would not be able to do so except narrating some stray incidents. I thought I should therefore compile a narrative of his life. I am giving it below. This was largely complied from the info in Wikipedia but vastly abridged. Despite all his weaknesses Gandhi was a great man. I would have loved to put together his idiosyncrasies in this narrative but I had no time as I wanted to post this today. I always believe that greatness should always be acknowledged but should never be made a basis for adulation. We should take the great strengths he had from his life but not all what he did and said without analysis. Absolutely no person should be held above criticism.

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was born on 2nd October 1869 at Porbander in Gujarat. His father was the Diwan of the Porbander state. He was powerfully influenced by his mother Putlibai who was a devout Jain. Hindu literature also made a strong impression on Gandhi.


When he was 13 years old, he was married to Kasturba who was then 14. Their first child was born when Gandhi was just 15 but died in childbirth. They had 4 more children, all sons.

Gandhi had his schooling in Porbander and then at Rajkot where he was a mediocre student. He finally passed his Matriculation from Bhavnagar with some difficulty. 

Gandhi then went to the University College of London in 1888 to study law. At London he came into contact with the Theosophists who made him read the Bhagavad-Gita along with them. This got him interested in religious thought.


His mother died while he was in London and when he came back to India. He tried to set up a law practice at Bombay which failed because he was too shy to speak in the court. He then returned back to Rajkot and was making a modest living drafting petitions for litigants but he had to give it up when he had a brush with a British Officer. Then in 1893 when he was just 24 years old, he accepted a yearlong contract with an Indian firm for a post in Natal, South Africa.

Gandhi spent a long period of 21 years in South Africa. His much quoted incident on the train where he was discriminated and thrown out did something to Gandhi. It is an alien country for him and another person in his place would have bore the discrimination but not so Gandhi and he fought back. He is a frail man and stood 5 foot 4 inches tall and weighed around 110 pounds, yet his determination is that of steel. He stood firm on the issue as well as the subsequent discriminatory incidents that took place.

Gandhi helped to found the Indian Natal Congress in 1894 which made the Indians in South Africa into a united force. He first used the weapon of peaceful Satyagraha in 1906 against the Transvaal government when it enacted a legislation which compelled the Indians to register. The Indian community accepted his plan and struggled peacefully for 7 years before the agitation was suppressed by the government but there was a public outcry against the force used to do so and the South African leader Jan Christian Smuts had to negotiate a compromise with Gandhi. Gandhi has adopted the weapon of Satyagraha from the Sinn Fein activists of Ireland who used it when was in England and made it more effective than them.

When the British were fighting a war with the Zulus, Gandhi formed a stretcher bearer corps of 20 members manned by Indians and commanded by him. This corps was treating the wounded British soldiers. This corps operated only for 2 months.

He came back to India in 1915 with an international reputation and the country welcomed him with open arms. He joined the Indian National Congress and was introduced to the national issues and politics by Gopalakrishna Gokhale.


Surprisingly enough, the pacific Gandhi mounted a war recruitment campaign during the first world war after the war conference called by the British in 1918. This time not an ambulance corps like the one he raised for the Zulu war but for actual combat. 

Gandhi’s first achievement came in 1918 with the Champaran agitation in Bihar. The peasants were forced by the British to grow Indigo whose demand has been declining. Furthermore, they are required to sell the produce to the British planters at a fixed price. Gandhi took up a non violent struggle in the area and won concessions from the government.


In 1918, Kheda in Gujarat was hit by floods and famine and the peasantry was demanding relief in taxes which the British were in no mood to consider. Gandhi initiated non cooperation in the area and the government had to yield in 5 months time. Vallabhai Patel represented the farmers in the talks with the British. 

In 1919 Gandhi launched the Khilafat movement for the restoration of Caliph in Turkey. After the Ottoman empire lost the 1st world war, the Caliphate was disbanded by the British and Gandhi started a movement called the Khilafat movement for its restoration. This movement however, has collapsed by 1922.


In 1920 Gandhi launched the non cooperation movement with the Jalianwalabagh massacre as a backdrop. A part of this is the Swadeshi movement which boycotted foreign made goods. This movement in turn was linked to the Khadi movement or wearing of self spun textiles. This movement caught the imagination of the Indian people and involved mass participation. When the movement reached a peak in 1922, there was a violent incident that took place at the Chauri Chaura police station in which the police station was torched and some policemen burned to death. Gandhi was so shocked with the violent incident that he immediately withdrew the movement despite opposition from many in the Congress including Nehru himself.

In 1927, the British appointed a commission under Sir John Simon for constitutional reforms which did not have a single Indian as its member and all the Indian political parties boycotted it. In 1928 Gandhi got a resolution passed by the Congress calling for the British government to either grant dominion status for India or face the non cooperation movement with complete Independence as its goal. Gandhi then launched a new satyagraha against the tax on salt in 1930.As part of this satyagraha he marched 388 KM from Ahmedabad to Dandi in Gujarat fro making the salt himself. This movement became very successful and the British imprisoned over 60,000 people. 

This led the British to negotiate with Gandhi which resulted in the Gandhi Irwin pact in 1931 and Gandhi was invited to the round table conference at London. This turned out to be a great disappointment to Gandhi and the people as it focused on the Indian princes and the Indian minorities instead of transfer of power.


Gandhi and Ambedkar often clashed because Ambedkar felt that the caste Hindus are biased against the Dalits and would not let them flourish. On the other hand Gandhi felt that they are a part of Hindus society but were suppressed and tried to redeem their rights. Gandhi had to fight both the sides as Ambedkar complained that Gandhi moved too slowly, while Hindu traditionalists said Gandhi was a dangerous radical who rejected scripture.

In the summer of 1934, three attempts were made on Gandhi's life. In the same year Gandhi resigned from the membership of the Congress party as some groups in the party felt that their views were being suppressed.

He returned to active politics again in 1936 when Nehru got elected as the president. Gandhi had a clash with Bose who was elected president after Nehru as they were ideologically opposite. Bose was reelected as the Congress president again in 1938 against Gandhi’s nominee Bhogaraju Pattabhi Seetharamayya (the founder of Andhra Bank) much to the distress of Gandhi. He went to the extent of saying that Pattabhi Seetharamayya’s defeat was his own defeat. Bose had to resign subsequently as Congress president due to the opposition from Gandhi.

Gandhi finally launched the Quit India movement in 1942 that culminated in India’s independence in 1947. Perhaps the nationalists should also thank Adolf Hitler because he had been indirectly responsible for our Independence. When the 2nd world ended in 1945, the economy of Britain was ruined and it lay in tatters. They had a tremendous reconstruction to do at home and did not have the means to stop the mass movement that was taking place in India and were forced to grant Independence. If the 2nd World war had not taken place at that juncture, then our freedom would have cost us many more lives before it could have been achieved.

Gandhi was assassinated in 1948 by a Hindu Mahasabha member Nathuram Godse. The immediate provocation by Gandhi had been that he went on a fast to put pressure on the Indian government to release Pakistan’s share of currency amounting to Rs 55 crore after the partition. His fast was just because that was the agreed share of Pakistan as per the segregation of assets but the government dithered and the new Pakistani government had no money.

So ultimately the great man has helped his own demise wih his uncompromising principles which he believed were correct. He had been larger than life while he lived and continues to do so even after his death.

GANDHI'S DESECENDENTS:
What happened to Gandhis children? The last of his sons died in 1969 and none have been successful. Gandhi refused to send them to school in South Africa because he felt that the western system of education would corrupt them.

Harilal (1888-1948) rebelled most strongly. He renounced all family ties in 1911 and embarked upon a tragic, lifelong path of self-destruction. He became a Muslim convert, an alcoholic, an embezzler; accounts of his arrests, public drunkenness, and destitution became commonplace. "I was a slave of my passions when Harilal was conceived," said Gandhi. Harilal appeared at his father's funeral in such derelict condition that few recognized him. He died in a tuberculosis sanitarium two months later.

Manilal (1892-1956) was in disgrace in 1916 after he lent his elder brother some money. Gandhi sent him to South Africa, where he edited an Indian newspaper. Later he spent a brief period in India.

Ramdas (1898-1969) had no taste for asceticism, yet participated in the grueling civil protests of the 1930s. Numerous jailings wrecked his health. Born and raised in South Africa, he never adjusted to the idealistic poverty imposed by his father.

Devadas (1900-1957) stayed near his father, sometimes being granted the privilege of serving as his secretary.

As per the info I could gather from the net, Gandhi's direct descendants numbered 47 in five nations in 1976 .

NEW INTERSTELLAR OBJECT-ATLAS/31

A new Comet known as 31/ATLAS ( Asteroid Terrestrial Impact Last Alert System) is approaching the solar system.....this was spotted by Astro...