Sunday, 30 December 2012

RAPE...A UNIVERSAL PHENOMENA???

When the rape of Delhi shot into the national news, rightfully everyone was enraged. I was also one such and was seething in anger. In the process like all others I too started hating the antiquated justice system of India as well as our social milieu that seem to facilitate the rapist.

Immediately after the rape, one of my FB friends Vyom Sharma posted some statistics on rape after reading which I was perplexed and left it at that. But it did remain in my mind subdued.

Today, the poor girl has died and the entire nation is in mourning. At this point, somehow I felt that I should study the phenomena of rape a little more. I was under the false impression that rape is rampant in India on account of a weak justice system which left offenders unpunished. I also thought that male chauvinism that is prevalent in India has a role to play in that.

So I took up Wikipedia for information on rape and the results were shocking indeed. Please observe the figures below. Absolute numbers do not give a clear picture and the number of rapes per 1 lac population is better:

The first figure in the table below shows the number of cases reported in 2009 and the second shows the figures for 1 lac of population in 2010.

JAPAN                           1289                     1.1
CANADA                          576                     1.4
INDIA                           22172                     1.8
SPAIN                            1578                      3.4
RUSSIA                          1007                     3.8
DENMARK                      352                      6.4
THAILAND                     4636                      6.7
GERMANY                    7724                      8.9
FRANCE                      10108                    16.0
UK                               15934                     27.0
USA                             84767                     29.0
BOTSWANA                  1865                     88.5

Reference-Rape Statistics-- Wikipedia.

The irony is that Denmark which has the highest standard of living in the world and where free sex is practiced has a rape incidence of 6.4 per lac which is more than 3 times that of India.

Similarly in Thailand where sex is used for tourism, the incidence is 6.7 per lac.

Just look at figures for the US, it has an incidence of 29 per lac which is some 14 times that of India. In absolute figures too, the US had over 84,000 rapes in 2009 compared to over 22,000 for India. People would be surprised to know that 10% of the rape victims in the US are male.

Look at the high incidence in UK or France. Development seems to be no indicator to the incidence and neither is equality of women a factor.

Botswana has the highest incidence of rape in the world.

The figures prove that rape is universal and does not confine itself to any one country. Psychologists have to search the reasons for this phenomenon. I am shocked at these figures and I am sure all who see my post would find them equally shocking.

Wednesday, 14 November 2012

SOCRATES THE GREAT PHILOSOPHER.

Socrates was born in Periclean Athens in 470 BC. His father was a sculptor and his mother was a delivery nurse. He trained to be a sculptor but the trade did not appeal to him. He then learnt Geometry, Astronomy and Philosophy.

One day, Socrates along with his friend visited the Oracle at Delphi. The Oracle asked them as to who they are. Socrates replied, “There is only one thing I know and that is I know nothing”. His friend asked the Oracle as to who is the wisest man in the world. The Oracle said” Know thyself. There is none wiser than Socrates among men”. This made Socrates perplexed. From then onward he made it a mission to find someone else wiser than him so that the Oracle’s words are not correct.

He used to start off early morning and whomever he found on the way he held discussions. He used the method of dialectic developed by Zeno. In this a question is asked, an answer obtained-this answer is rejected by using logic and another question asked. No one could ever defeat him in a discussion.

His first question is “Tau Ti” which means, “What is it?” He always said define your terms first before starting any discussion. He said that defining a thing is knowledge and knowledge is nothing but virtue.

He called himself a Gadfly. He claimed that God made him like that so that he could bite humans and make them think and find knowledge. He also claimed himself to be a delivery nurse, one who delivers right ideas from humans.

Socrates was very ugly. He was short and fat. He had a bald head, big paunch, broad nose, a big mouth, eyes jutting out and a round face. Despite all this, once he opened his mouth people forgot his appearance. Such a wise man is he.

He never bothered about tomorrow and lived only for today. This put his wife and his three children in great difficulties, as he never bothered about them. The moment she saw him his wife used to admonish him and so he avoided going home altogether. He had food when a student invited him for food or else he went hungry.

He is not a drunkard but had liquor when some of his students offered it to him. In drinking too none could beat him. He had one old coat which he wore all the time and he had no sandals on his feet.

He suddenly used to lapse into meditation disregarding where he was. One day early in the morning he stood still at a place in one morning and went into one of his trances. People gathered around him in curiosity. He stood like that till next day morning and after coming out of the state walked off without talking to anyone watching him. There were other instances like this.

There was a tragedian named Agathon in Athens. One day he invited Socrates to a banquet. There a discussion on Love developed. Socrates in his usual fashion rejected all the theories that were presented to him defining love. He finally said Love is the souls yearning for experiencing the great beauty. A lover not only wants to see the beauty but also wants to create it. He also wants it to be permanent in the physical self. That is why man and woman love each other. That is why parents love their children. They not only bear children for perpetration of themselves but they are also their partners in search for their continuous search for beauty, their inheritors and researchers for that purpose.

What is this beauty that we are trying to give permanence through love? It is wisdom, morality, self-respect, bravery, justice, and faith. In one word beauty is truth. It is that which directly takes us into communion with God.

Socrates never wrote down his philosophical theories and that was done by Plato. Plato was a great writer and his prose is mercurial. He used the dialogues to put forth the views. There are four main dialogues of Plato. 1) Symposium- This contains the meaning of love and we described it in the earlier paras.2) Apology-In this Socrates answers the charges leveled against him.3) Crito-In this Crito the student of Socrates advises him to flee the country and the answer given by Socrates.4) Phaedo- In this the death of Socrates is described.

In all the dialogues of Plato, Socrates is the mouthpiece. It is believed by philosophers that Plato has in fact given out his own philosophy in the dialogues from the mouth of Socrates. Socrates is concerned more with ethical questions than metaphysics

Socrates criticized the Olympian Gods and was believed to be an atheist. This was actually not so but he believed that there is only one god and the soul is indestructible.

Socrates was very much against Democracy. He felt that since democracy is dependent on group strength, well thought out decisions could not be taken. After the Peloponnesian wars between Athens and Sparta Athens was defeated and Democracy was replaced by the 30 tyrants. The people rebelled on them again and Democracy was restored. The democratic Government turned against Socrates for his so called Atheism and his repulsion for democracy. They brought the charge of rejecting their gods as well as worshiping other gods on him. They also said that Socrates corrupted the youth and the fit punishment for him was death.

This charge was brought about by Anitus who was the head of the democratic Government that came to power in Athens. His son was a disciple of Socrates and defied his own father. A court of 500 judges tried Socrates and the prosecutor was Miletus. His death sentence was passed with 280 for and 220 against. The sentence was to be carried out with drinking of hemlock, a poisonous drink. As per the laws of Athens at that time for a man who was sentenced to death, there was a provision of seeking another punishment instead. He could have asked for imprisonment, he could have paid the penalty and got released or else he could have left Athens for another country. But he willfully chose death.

The defense put forward by Socrates against the death sentence was told in a beautiful narrative in a dialogue called “Apology” by Plato. In this Socrates said that he is not willing to take an alternate punishment. He said, “ I do not know death is good or bad but paying a fine or seeking imprisonment or seeking banishment form the country are indisputably bad. Why should I opt for them?”

Plato wrote about his death in a dialogue called “Phaedo” which is considered to be a gem in world literature. Socrates was finally executed by drinking of Hemlock.

Monday, 5 November 2012

DOES LIFE EXIST ON OTHER PLANETS IN THE UNIVERSE.

Life has arisen on the earth due to certain climatic conditions that are conducive to its formation and multiplication. Life on earth started as unicellular organisms which became more complex with the passage of millions of ears till the mammals originated in the Tertiary period of the Cenozoic era 75 million years ago followed by man in the Quaternary period of the same era a mere 1 million years ago.
Our galaxy, the Milky Way consists of 10,000 crore stars (10 raised to the power of 11) and the known universe consists of 10,000 crore galaxies. This means the total number of stars in the known universe is 10 raised to the power of 22 which is a mind boggling figure.
Astronomers have determined that 15% of the stars in the universe have solar systems. This translates to a figure of over 10 raised to the power of 21 for stars having solar systems.
Now for life to evolve the planets have to possess certain conditions. They are
1. Moderate temperature---If the planet is too close or too far away from the star, then the conditions of life prevailing on them is nil.
2. Presence of water---The presence of water on the planet is a must for the existence of life as we know.
3. Presence of Oxygen---Presence of Oxygen too is essential for life.
4. Presence of atmosphere---The planet has to be covered by atmosphere so that harmful cosmic rays do not get through and destroy life.
5. Moderate mass---If the planet is too heavy then life may evolve but that would prevent the evolution of higher and complex forms of life.
Let us now assume that point number 1 would be met only by 1 out of each 1000 planets. This would reduce the possible number of planets that support life to 10 raised to the power of 18.
Similarly if we consider each of the other conditions would have a chance of 1 in a 1000, the figure of the planets that can support life gets reduced by another 12 zeroes. 
Even after this severe reduction, still we would be left with a figure of 10 raised to the power of 6 or a million planets that can support life.

If there are a million planets in the Universe that can support life, then some of them would have life forms that would have evolved less than us and some of them would be more evolved than us. If we consider that the evolution of life on earth is in the top 10% of the planets, then there should be at least some 100,000 planets where life has progressed more than us.
Of these 100,000 planets if we consider that only 1 in a 1000 has achieved a civilization that can crack the light barrier, then the figure of such planets get reduced to just 100. 
100 is not a big figure from the Universe, but how is it that not a single civilization has tried to contact us? Even with our limited development we are desperately seeking to contact other civilizations in the universe, so they would have also done the same if they exist.

These assumptions points to the following 3 possibilities:
1. There is no other planet in the Universe that is as advanced as our own.
2. The barrier of light cannot be breached.
3. We are the only civilization in the Universe.

Now, the above deductions have been done taking into account life as we know. There is no reason to believe that there may not be life forms that are totally different from the principles that are known to us.
I am no professional astronomer but just a person interested in Astronomy and the mysteries of the Universe. I faintly remember reading a book in my native language Telugu over 30 years ago which has similarly deduced about intelligent life forms in the universe. I do not exactly recollect what the book has said in its conclusion, but it has proceeded on similar lines.
I have arrived at the above from the knowledge I have and it may look fallacious to a professional who is researching in the field of life in the universe yet I feel very interested on the matter and am posting this.

Wednesday, 3 October 2012

MAHATMA GANDHI--AN ABRIDGED CRITICAL BIOGRAPHY

Today is the birthday of a great man. I have read his "My Experiments with Truth" a long time ago . When I remembered him I found that if someone asks me to narrate his life I would not be able to do so except narrating some stray incidents. I thought I should therefore compile a narrative of his life. I am giving it below. This was largely complied from the info in Wikipedia but vastly abridged. Despite all his weaknesses Gandhi was a great man. I would have loved to put together his idiosyncrasies in this narrative but I had no time as I wanted to post this today. I always believe that greatness should always be acknowledged but should never be made a basis for adulation. We should take the great strengths he had from his life but not all what he did and said without analysis. Absolutely no person should be held above criticism.

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was born on 2nd October 1869 at Porbander in Gujarat. His father was the Diwan of the Porbander state. He was powerfully influenced by his mother Putlibai who was a devout Jain. Hindu literature also made a strong impression on Gandhi.


When he was 13 years old, he was married to Kasturba who was then 14. Their first child was born when Gandhi was just 15 but died in childbirth. They had 4 more children, all sons.

Gandhi had his schooling in Porbander and then at Rajkot where he was a mediocre student. He finally passed his Matriculation from Bhavnagar with some difficulty. 

Gandhi then went to the University College of London in 1888 to study law. At London he came into contact with the Theosophists who made him read the Bhagavad-Gita along with them. This got him interested in religious thought.


His mother died while he was in London and when he came back to India. He tried to set up a law practice at Bombay which failed because he was too shy to speak in the court. He then returned back to Rajkot and was making a modest living drafting petitions for litigants but he had to give it up when he had a brush with a British Officer. Then in 1893 when he was just 24 years old, he accepted a yearlong contract with an Indian firm for a post in Natal, South Africa.

Gandhi spent a long period of 21 years in South Africa. His much quoted incident on the train where he was discriminated and thrown out did something to Gandhi. It is an alien country for him and another person in his place would have bore the discrimination but not so Gandhi and he fought back. He is a frail man and stood 5 foot 4 inches tall and weighed around 110 pounds, yet his determination is that of steel. He stood firm on the issue as well as the subsequent discriminatory incidents that took place.

Gandhi helped to found the Indian Natal Congress in 1894 which made the Indians in South Africa into a united force. He first used the weapon of peaceful Satyagraha in 1906 against the Transvaal government when it enacted a legislation which compelled the Indians to register. The Indian community accepted his plan and struggled peacefully for 7 years before the agitation was suppressed by the government but there was a public outcry against the force used to do so and the South African leader Jan Christian Smuts had to negotiate a compromise with Gandhi. Gandhi has adopted the weapon of Satyagraha from the Sinn Fein activists of Ireland who used it when was in England and made it more effective than them.

When the British were fighting a war with the Zulus, Gandhi formed a stretcher bearer corps of 20 members manned by Indians and commanded by him. This corps was treating the wounded British soldiers. This corps operated only for 2 months.

He came back to India in 1915 with an international reputation and the country welcomed him with open arms. He joined the Indian National Congress and was introduced to the national issues and politics by Gopalakrishna Gokhale.


Surprisingly enough, the pacific Gandhi mounted a war recruitment campaign during the first world war after the war conference called by the British in 1918. This time not an ambulance corps like the one he raised for the Zulu war but for actual combat. 

Gandhi’s first achievement came in 1918 with the Champaran agitation in Bihar. The peasants were forced by the British to grow Indigo whose demand has been declining. Furthermore, they are required to sell the produce to the British planters at a fixed price. Gandhi took up a non violent struggle in the area and won concessions from the government.


In 1918, Kheda in Gujarat was hit by floods and famine and the peasantry was demanding relief in taxes which the British were in no mood to consider. Gandhi initiated non cooperation in the area and the government had to yield in 5 months time. Vallabhai Patel represented the farmers in the talks with the British. 

In 1919 Gandhi launched the Khilafat movement for the restoration of Caliph in Turkey. After the Ottoman empire lost the 1st world war, the Caliphate was disbanded by the British and Gandhi started a movement called the Khilafat movement for its restoration. This movement however, has collapsed by 1922.


In 1920 Gandhi launched the non cooperation movement with the Jalianwalabagh massacre as a backdrop. A part of this is the Swadeshi movement which boycotted foreign made goods. This movement in turn was linked to the Khadi movement or wearing of self spun textiles. This movement caught the imagination of the Indian people and involved mass participation. When the movement reached a peak in 1922, there was a violent incident that took place at the Chauri Chaura police station in which the police station was torched and some policemen burned to death. Gandhi was so shocked with the violent incident that he immediately withdrew the movement despite opposition from many in the Congress including Nehru himself.

In 1927, the British appointed a commission under Sir John Simon for constitutional reforms which did not have a single Indian as its member and all the Indian political parties boycotted it. In 1928 Gandhi got a resolution passed by the Congress calling for the British government to either grant dominion status for India or face the non cooperation movement with complete Independence as its goal. Gandhi then launched a new satyagraha against the tax on salt in 1930.As part of this satyagraha he marched 388 KM from Ahmedabad to Dandi in Gujarat fro making the salt himself. This movement became very successful and the British imprisoned over 60,000 people. 

This led the British to negotiate with Gandhi which resulted in the Gandhi Irwin pact in 1931 and Gandhi was invited to the round table conference at London. This turned out to be a great disappointment to Gandhi and the people as it focused on the Indian princes and the Indian minorities instead of transfer of power.


Gandhi and Ambedkar often clashed because Ambedkar felt that the caste Hindus are biased against the Dalits and would not let them flourish. On the other hand Gandhi felt that they are a part of Hindus society but were suppressed and tried to redeem their rights. Gandhi had to fight both the sides as Ambedkar complained that Gandhi moved too slowly, while Hindu traditionalists said Gandhi was a dangerous radical who rejected scripture.

In the summer of 1934, three attempts were made on Gandhi's life. In the same year Gandhi resigned from the membership of the Congress party as some groups in the party felt that their views were being suppressed.

He returned to active politics again in 1936 when Nehru got elected as the president. Gandhi had a clash with Bose who was elected president after Nehru as they were ideologically opposite. Bose was reelected as the Congress president again in 1938 against Gandhi’s nominee Bhogaraju Pattabhi Seetharamayya (the founder of Andhra Bank) much to the distress of Gandhi. He went to the extent of saying that Pattabhi Seetharamayya’s defeat was his own defeat. Bose had to resign subsequently as Congress president due to the opposition from Gandhi.

Gandhi finally launched the Quit India movement in 1942 that culminated in India’s independence in 1947. Perhaps the nationalists should also thank Adolf Hitler because he had been indirectly responsible for our Independence. When the 2nd world ended in 1945, the economy of Britain was ruined and it lay in tatters. They had a tremendous reconstruction to do at home and did not have the means to stop the mass movement that was taking place in India and were forced to grant Independence. If the 2nd World war had not taken place at that juncture, then our freedom would have cost us many more lives before it could have been achieved.

Gandhi was assassinated in 1948 by a Hindu Mahasabha member Nathuram Godse. The immediate provocation by Gandhi had been that he went on a fast to put pressure on the Indian government to release Pakistan’s share of currency amounting to Rs 55 crore after the partition. His fast was just because that was the agreed share of Pakistan as per the segregation of assets but the government dithered and the new Pakistani government had no money.

So ultimately the great man has helped his own demise wih his uncompromising principles which he believed were correct. He had been larger than life while he lived and continues to do so even after his death.

GANDHI'S DESECENDENTS:
What happened to Gandhis children? The last of his sons died in 1969 and none have been successful. Gandhi refused to send them to school in South Africa because he felt that the western system of education would corrupt them.

Harilal (1888-1948) rebelled most strongly. He renounced all family ties in 1911 and embarked upon a tragic, lifelong path of self-destruction. He became a Muslim convert, an alcoholic, an embezzler; accounts of his arrests, public drunkenness, and destitution became commonplace. "I was a slave of my passions when Harilal was conceived," said Gandhi. Harilal appeared at his father's funeral in such derelict condition that few recognized him. He died in a tuberculosis sanitarium two months later.

Manilal (1892-1956) was in disgrace in 1916 after he lent his elder brother some money. Gandhi sent him to South Africa, where he edited an Indian newspaper. Later he spent a brief period in India.

Ramdas (1898-1969) had no taste for asceticism, yet participated in the grueling civil protests of the 1930s. Numerous jailings wrecked his health. Born and raised in South Africa, he never adjusted to the idealistic poverty imposed by his father.

Devadas (1900-1957) stayed near his father, sometimes being granted the privilege of serving as his secretary.

As per the info I could gather from the net, Gandhi's direct descendants numbered 47 in five nations in 1976 .

Wednesday, 5 September 2012

USAIN BOLT A SUPERLATIVE ATHLETE.

Jamaica is a country with a population of just around 29 lakhs which is much lesser than many of our cities. Yet it has produced Usain Bolt, undoubtedly the greatest sprinter the world has produced till now. His name Bolt is very apt for his performances.

One cannot believe that at the world level a sprinter can be so dominant that the athlete coming second to him never ever had a semblance of a chance. He did suffer two losses in the 100 meters in his career by the US Tyson Gay and Justin Gatlin who did defeat him once apiece but that is about all. Such a performance in sprinting is simply phenomenal. 

That Jamaica has tied with US at the just concluded world championships in terms of Gold Medals (6) is amazing and Bolt is the person who made that possible by winning 3 of the gold medals won by Jamaica. Bolt is 6 foot 5 in height and has started his sports career by playing cricket and football.

He has first competed in the Olympics in 2008 at Beijing at the age of 22 which is old for a sprinter. He won Gold Medals at all the 3 events he competed (100, 200 & 4*100 relay) at the Beijing Olympics and repeated the performance at the 2012 London Olympics.

In the world cup athletics he won two silvers at Osaka in 2007 but after 2008, there is no looking back for Bolt. He won gold in all the 3 events at Berlin in 2009. He would have repeated the feat in Daegu in 2011 but was disqualified for a false start in the 100 meters and thus could only win 2 Gold medals. He has now won the 3 gold medals at the World Cup at Moscow. He is now 27 years old. It is a wonder that he is able to outclass other sprinters who are much younger than him in the present world cup athletics at Moscow.

This is a phenomenal record and he remains unchallenged both at the Olympics and the world championships since 2008. Gold medal winners may put in a superlative performance and win races but Bolt simply demolishes the opposition.

At 27 he can be termed old for a sprinter and perhaps may not be able to carry on after the next Olympics in 2016. Even the great Usain Bolt cannot compete with age. Jamaica would miss him dearly after his retirement and so would the world. Jamaica has many great sprinters but none like Usain Bolt, at least not till now.

Wednesday, 22 August 2012

DRAFTING THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA—WAS IT DONE SOLELY BY DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR?

It is generally believed by many people that the constitution of India was drafted by Dr B.R.Ambedkar alone. Although Dr Ambedkar was the chairman of the drafting committee, and was a very highly educated and erudite person, it was just not he alone who drafted the constitution.

In August 1947, the Drafting Committee was appointed, with Dr B. R. Ambedkar as the Chairman along with six other members assisted by a constitutional advisor. These members were:

1. Kanaiyalal Maneklal Munshi (K M Munshi, Advocate and Ex- Home Minister, Bombay).
2. Alladi Krishnaswamy Iyer (Ex- Advocate General, Madras State).
3. N Gopalaswami Ayengar (Advocate-Civil Servant of the Madras State--Ex-Prime Minister, J&K and later member of Nehru Cabinet).
4. B L Mitter (Ex-Advocate General, India)---Replaced by Madhav Rao (Legal advisor to the Maharaja of Baroda)
5. Md. Saadullah (Ex- Chief Minister of Assam, Muslim League member)
6. D P Khaitan (Scion of Khaitan Business family and a renowned lawyer)—Replaced by T.T.Krishnamachari..

It can be seen from the committee that all its members were eminent jurists except for Md Saadullah.

The constitutional advisor was Sir Benegal Narsing Rau. A very eminent jurist of his time, Rau not only played a key role in drafting the Constitution of India but also that of Burma. Though he was not part of the Committee itself, he was next to Amedkar in his role. Rau, who was knighted in 1938 for revising the entire Indian statutory code, was responsible for the democratic structure of the Constitution and prepared the final draft. He went on to represent India at the UN Security Council and was a judge at the International Court of Justice in The Hague.

A Draft Constitution was prepared by the committee and submitted to the Assembly on 4 November 1947. Draft constitution was debated and over 2000 amendments were moved over a period of two years. Finally the process was completed IN Nov 1949 and Constituent assembly adopted the constitution.

FOREIGN CONSTITUTIONS THAT INFLUENCED THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION:
1. The architects of Indian constitution were most heavily influenced by the British model of parliamentary democracy.

2. A number of principles were adopted from the Constitution of the United States of America, including the separation of powers among the major branches of government, and the establishment of a supreme court.

3. The principles adopted from Canada were Unitary government with strong centre and also distribution of powers between central government and provinces along with placing residuary powers with central government.

4. From Ireland, directive principle of state policy was adopted.

5. From Germany the principle of suspension of fundamental rights during emergency was adopted.

6. From Australia the principle of Concurrent list and Language of preamble was adopted.

At various stages all the committee members were involved in the making of the draft constitution, but there is no doubt that Dr B.R.Ambedkar along with Benegal Narsing Rau has been the guiding force behind it.

Sunday, 12 August 2012

WHY THE PRESENT VIOLENCE IN ASSAM?

The root cause of the problem in Assam is the illegal emigration from Bangladesh that is taking place. It has given rise to continuing violence in Assam. The present clashes taking part in the BTAD(Bodoland Territorial Autonomus District) of Assam is but an offshoot of the same.

One shudders to think about the Nellie massacre in which 1800 men, women and children who were immigrant Muslims from Bangladesh were killed in 1983 by Assamese tribals.
After some failed accords, the Assam Accord was concluded by Rajiv Gandhi in 1985. This accord fixed the cut-off date to determine illegal migrants in Assam as March 25, 1971, the day Bangladesh was born.

The Accord classified the migrants from Bangladesh as follows:
1. Those who had come and settled in the state on or before this date shall be regarded as citizens of India.
2. Those migrants who have arrived in the state after this date are to be detected and expelled in accordance with the law.

But after signing of the Assam Accord, the Assamese rebel groups launched a militant struggle against the government and asked them to expel all illegal immigrants irrespective of their time of migration to India.

The overall Muslim population of the area has grown from 18 per cent in the 1960s to over 40 per cent now which indicates the scale of migration that is taking place. If one compares the decadal growth if population of India vis a vis the state of Assam, it is clear that large scale immigration is taking place continuously thanks to the Congress party treating them as vote banks.

Since Independence, except for the periods 1985-90 and 1996-2001 when the Assam Gana Parishad ruled, it is the Congress government that is holding power in the state.

The biggest problem is that the Bangladeshi government denies that there is a single illegal Bangladeshi immigrant in India. With the stand of the Bangladeshi government being thus, they would not even accept a single person deported from India. So, there is nothing India could do on this account.

The only solution appears to be to immediately compile a directory of all the citizens of Assam and issue identification to them without touching the citizenship issue. If Indian citizenship is linked to the identification card, then all Assamese militant groups would be up in arms, therefore the card has to be an instrument for simply enumerating the present population of Assam.
This would put a check on the illegal migration that is taking place continuously. But of course, why would governments who thrive on vote bank politics do such a thing?

Friday, 10 August 2012

BIG BANG THEORY--FORMATION OF STARS

I wanted to post something today and felt the most appropriate would be the theory of the formation of the stars. I had a great fascination for astronomy as a boy and retain it even today.

The most accepted theory for the formation of the Universe is the Big Bang theory. This theory was propounded by Georges Lemaitre, a Belgian scientist in 1927. As per this theory, as the Universe is expanding today, it must have been constricted once upon a time. This theory has been modified a number of times by various other scientists, but the core philosophy of the theory remains.

As per this, probably between 4000-6000 crores years ago all the mass in the Universe is concentrated as a single whole, a primeval atom. Matter is extremely concentrated in this whole and perhaps all the matter of the Universe only occupied as much space as our present day Solar System.

The statistics of this Primeval atom are mind boggling. A cubic centimeter of matter from it would have weighed some 100 million tons. Matter becomes hotter as it constricts and colder when it expands and in this concentrated primeval atom the temperatures would have been so enormous that even atoms did not exists and neither did protons and electrons. The temperature would have been 100 billion degrees Kelvin one hundredth of a second after the Big Bang.

Only the neutrons remained in this primeval state and scientists have named this primeval matter as Neutronium. It would not have been possible for the matter to be in this intensely hot state for long and it would have exploded only in a fraction of time. The massive explosion threw matter in all directions and with the expansion they have cooled slowly to form atoms and later coalesce into stars and solar systems and planets.

Tuesday, 7 August 2012

CREDITABLE PERFORMANCE BY THE ATHLETICS TEAM AT THE OLYMPICS.



Okay, we may miss the Gold but India has come a long way in the Olympics. I have followed Olympics since 1968. Mostly Indian athletes with very few exceptions stood just nowhere. If we leave Hockey, wrestling was our only hope earlier.

We then slowly gained a footing in Shooting, Boxing and later in Archery. This time it is heartening to see the level of our athletics team increase. Krishna Punia and Vikas Gowda have done very well in the Discus throw. Krishna Punia stood 7th in her event and Vikas Gowda qualified for the final with 5th position. This is a record as no two members of our athletics team have ever qualified for the finals in the same Olympics. Add to this the wonderful performance of K.T.Irfan in the 20 KM walk who stood 10th. He did his best and broke the national record by a whole 2 minutes. 

I am giving below the Olympic finalists India had over the years:

1. Milkha Singh—400 meters—1960 Rome ---Stood only 4th after breaking the world record as all the first 4 competitors have broken the world record then. I have seen the film clippings of this guy running in the documentaries shown before the start of movies then. In all the races in India, the guy who came 2nd after him was always some 25 meters behind him.

2. Gurbachan Singh Ranadhava—110 meters hurdles----1964 Tokyo ----Stood 5th.

3. Sriram Singh---800 meters---1976 Montreal ---Stood 7th.

4. P.T.Usha----400 meters hurdles---1984 Los Angeles ----Stood 4th.

5. Anju Bobby George---Long Jump---2004 Athens----Stood 5th.

The increase in standards of our athletics team augurs well for our country and I am sure that a at least a few youngsters would get inspired and bring in better performances that would yield some medals in the next Olympics at Rio.

Thursday, 5 July 2012

HIGGS BOSON DISCOVERY AND SATYENDRANATH BOSE.

Scientists at the world’s biggest atom smashing facility at CERN ( European Center for Nuclear Research) claimed the discovery of a new subatomic particle on Wednesday. They found it to be “consistent” with the long-sought Higgs boson, popularly known as the “God particle” that helps explain what gives size and shape to all matter in the universe.

This is till now a theoretical particle which is seen as a key to understanding why matter has mass. It is as important as the Newtons discovery of gravity.

Six people, across three different teams, are credited with the discovery of Higgs Boson:

Robert Brout and François Englert of the Université Libre de Bruxelles—Belgium
Peter Higgs of University of Edinburgh—Scotland
G. S. Guralnik of Brown University---USA
C. R. Hagen of the University of Rochester--, New York, USA
Tom Kibble at Imperial College---London, UK

Boson was named after Satyendranath Bose an Indian scientist who was born in 1894 at Calcutta. He attended the Hindu School in Calcutta, followed by the Presidency College and was the topper in his class in both the institutions. Meghnad Saha, the famous Indian Astrophysicist was second in the class after Bose.

Along with Saha, Bose prepared the translation of the Special and General Theories of Relativity into English in 1919 based on the German and the French translations. He joined as a Reader in the University of Dhaka. Bose has set up many new departments for branches of Physics there. While working there Bose wrote a paper on deriving Planck’s Quantum Radiation Law. This paper gave rise to Bose-Einstein Statistics which were seminal in creating the field of Quantum Statistics.

This paper was not accepted for publication so Bose sent the paper to Einstein who recognizing its importance translated it into German and presented it on Bose’s behalf. As a result of this Bose got an opportunity to work in the famous European Laboratories where he associated with De Broglie, Marie Curie and Einstein. He later became the Head of the Department of Physics at Dhaka University and taught later at Calcutta University till 1956. He then became the Vice Chancellor of the Viswa Bharathi University. He died in 1974. Bosons are particles that obey Bose Einstein Statistics. The particle was named in his honor.