NASA
has given a working definition of life in the 1990’s.
‘Life
is a self-sustaining chemical system capable of Darwinian Evolution”.
The
Earth may look ancient to us with its 450 crore years of age, yet the average
age of the galactic planets is about 600 crore years. This means, if other
civilizations have evolved and progressed ahead of us, then they should leave
their techno signature wherever they lived and possibly they could have
transmitted them into space.
Now
we come to the Fermi’s paradox. Enrico Fermi won the Nobel Prize in 1938 for
Nuclear Physics. He was on the team where the first atom bomb was built by the
US. He became a professor at the University of Chicago and later collaborated
as a consultant for the Hydrogen bomb.
One
day in 1950 Fermi got into a discussion with fellow physicists about the news
on Flying saucers in the New Yorker magazine. The group as scientists realized
there should be many stars that had planets and supported life and the space
should be teeming with aliens. If there are so many, then we should at least
see the evidence about some of them.
The
fact is one of the following statements had to be false:
1.
There has to be a flaw in the logic that extra-terrestrial intelligence must be
widespread
2.
Or in the assumption that we should have
detected it.
3.
Or in the assertion that there is no evidence
for it.
That
is the Fermi’s paradox. Fermi’s question is; where are those teeming aliens, if
they indeed exist?
At
least some of you must have read the Mars series of Edgar Rice Burroughs. At
one time I found them extremely fascinating. One of them Princess of Mars had
been made into a film and I love it even now.
In
that the lead character John Carter accidentally lands up on Mars and finds
himself to be far stronger than on the earth because of its lower gravity. The
gravity on Mars is just over 1/3rds on earth. So in practice a resident from
the earth would find himself 12 times stronger. If he jumps (and controls
himself of course) he would jump 12 times more distance than on earth.
Technically,
life or intelligence can exist in many forms that would be far beyond our
definition. Most of our authors and movie creators love to depict extra
terrestrials resembling us, with hands, feet, eyes et al. But is that not short
sightedness? What is us? We are nothing but mere recorded electrical impulses
in the brain. The electrical impulses record whatever inputs they get through
the sensory organs and form the us. The body therefore is always secondary to
the brain.
I
have mentioned this because in 1957 the famous Cosmologist Fred Hoyle has
written a novel called the “Black Cloud”. In that book the intelligence is the
Black Cloud of gas itself and dust itself like the Nebulas we know of. His black
cloud was intelligent and was communicating with earthlings through radio
waves. So the particles within it could achieve a sufficient degree of
organization to initiate the thought processes. Impossible? Maybe, and maybe
not!!!
Some
people wrote books on Silicon beings. Silicon and Carbon are common elements,
both on the earth and the universe. There is plenty of Silicon in the earth’s
crust but it does not form any complex molecules whatsoever like Carbon. It
combines with Oxygen to form Silica, the constituent of most rocks, but it does
not go further and undergo any change. Same is the case of silicon in all the
asteroids that have been examined. Unlike Silicon Carbon is also found in the
Asteroids as complex molecules. So, there is no reason to believe that life may
form from Silicon. But how can we say this with any finality? This is merely an
estimation we make with whatever information we know.
No comments:
Post a Comment