One of my cousins has questioned me as to what
ails Democracy in our country and how it can be bettered. She wanted a one
liner on that, but I felt the question is very complex and replied it in 2
pages which I give below:
I find it impossible to express what to do in a
one liner. For this unless we go into its evolution and the need for it, one
cannot pin point what can be done to implement it effectively.
Democracy is something that automatically comes
in nature. Each animal (including humans) have a right to do whatever they
want. They are equal in possessing that right to decide what to hunt, what to
eat, where to live, whom to mate and so on. But this right in nature is
restricted by some factors like physical strength and the environment.
With time society slowly evolved when humans (being
the species with better brains) realised that living in a society provided more
security than living alone or in small groups and they would be able to protect
themselves and fulfil their aspirations better if they give up some of their
rights and elected a headman to bring in cooperation in the group. This change happened
over thousands of years. In fact the change happened in other species too like
lions and other herd of animals which move together, but due to their limited
way of thinking it remained rudimentary.
Yes, apes (all hominids) too have such a
structure which is bigger, but their structure is at a rudimentary level where a
group of say a maximum of 100 in number would be its members, so their societal
structure remained simple. However, in the case of humans, the number of
members in the groups went on increasing and with it came complexity of the
societal structure. Internal relations in the group had to be regulated and
elaborate rules had to be laid down. Again this system slowly evolved itself
and nobody forcefully implemented it from above. However, these rules evolved
differently in different groups but later when those individual groups
coalesced to form a bigger group, proto towns/cities emerged and when a number
of such cities and communities coalesced slowly they formed into a nation. Now
the headman had turned into a King and he usurped the full powers to regulate
the group and punish those who transgressed the regulations of the group.
By this time, society had become more complex
and a need arose to document such rules arose lest their voluntary practice
deteriorate into a free for all behaviour because in humans their animal
instinct remained beneath the veneer of society.. The first king who did that
in recorded history was Hammurabi of Babylon in the 18th century BC.
He merely codified the laws of his time in the world and got them carved on rocks
and displayed them to his subjects. This same practice was adopted by our King
Ashoka much later in the 3rd century BC.
In larger societies in the world, it is the
Kingship that evolved with time. But, there are also some societies which while
electing a king made sure that his powers do not become absolute like in the
case of kingship and also retained the right to elect their king unlike in the
case of monarchy the succession became automatic with the kings son taking over
the fathers domain. This happened in many parts of the world and in India we
can see tribal republics in the 6th century BC like the Sakyas of
Buddha and the Vrijjis which are an alliance of many tribes led by the
Licchavis. Their territory is on the border of Himalayas.
For humans, Democracy is a superior system
because it restored the right of the people to decide who should be their
leader through an election and what their laws should be which right they
originally possessed even when they existed as small groups under a headman.
Having defined the background of Democracy
thus, we proceed to see what rights a Democracy offers to its people. They are
summarily:
1. Equality
before law.
2. The
freedom to do whatever they want provided it does not violate the societal
norms and impinge on others rights.
3. The
freedom to elect their head.
The most important in this chain is “Equality
before law”. It is this pillar of Democracy that guards all other aspects of
Democracy. The law has the power to check even the elected head from
transgressing the law that is laid down.
So, an effective justice system is the one that
delivers effective Democracy. So, every effort should be made to strengthen the
justice system first. If the justice
system is ineffective as it happens in India abetted by a corrupt Police force
then that is the aspect on which every citizen should concentrate and contribute.
What can an ordinary citizen do to correct the
Justice system? Very little, but the only thing people can do is to elect good
representatives so they in turn influence the law making in Parliament. This
would sound more like a utopia because the current society accepts corruption
and making money is viewed as the epitome of life. The means by which the money
is made does not matter at all. So our society abets corruption by the way it
thinks. It is the society that has to first change, but unless efforts are made
in that direction Democracy can never be successful.
What has to be done to change is the moral of the
society. It should realize that it is the law and justice system that protects
its members and delivers them the fruits of Democracy. The Justice system can
function effectively only when the moral structure of the society changes. How
does one change the moral of the society? Is that possible?
One has to go to its basics for that, what is
Law? It is merely a set of rules laid down over generations in order to protect
the society and give security to individuals who are its members. Humans have
something known as a conscience, and the society instils into their minds what
is right and what is wrong. It is this conscience that chains the humans and
prevents them from deteriorating into animals of the jungle. How can morals be
changed? By emphasising that a particular behaviour is right and another
behaviour is wrong.
The most effective way to do that is to tackle
society at the foundation itself, by inculcating what are the right things to
do in the minds of children. Teach them moral science and make it compulsory in
all classes up to say 6th. This is nothing new and the society had
already tried it but dropped it with time. I studied in Saint Joseph’s convent
at Kakinada till 3rd (as it was a girls school and allowed boys then
only till that class) and we had a subject called moral science which taught us
what is the model behaviour. Why the Governments think it is unnecessary to
teach any morals beats me, because no Government school teaches that now. We
learn history, Geography, Science and Math but not a model code of conduct perhaps
because it is deemed unnecessary to be a good citizen. The governments feel
that to be a good human being in society is passé.
No doubt what is read in moral science may not
be followed, but humans have this thing called conscience and it keeps on
pricking a person if he does anything against it. With all that teaching strong
ideas of good and bad would get imprinted into young minds and they would grow
up to be better citizens than without any education on morals.
No comments:
Post a Comment